WEALTH
STREAM NEWS
STREAM NEWS
Stay up to date with the latest news from the Hispanic Wealth Project
Why the CFA’s Stance on Real Estate Commissions Could Hurt Future Homebuyers
In a recent piece on HousingWire, industry leaders including Gary Acosta, Courtney Johnson Rose, Hope Atuel, and Ryan Weyandt expressed deep concerns about the Consumer Federation of America’s (CFA) push to end broker cooperative compensation in real estate transactions. Broker cooperative compensation allows the seller’s agent commission to be split between the seller’s and buyer’s agents, making it easier for buyers, particularly first-time homebuyers, to afford professional representation without paying out-of-pocket fees. The CFA argues that this commission structure should be “de-coupled,” meaning buyers would pay their agent fees independently of sellers.
While the CFA’s intention might be to create a more transparent and competitive marketplace, critics argue that the changes would likely benefit wealthier, older individuals and disadvantage first-time homebuyers, many of whom are from minority communities. Without cooperative compensation, these buyers may struggle to afford the cost of an agent, potentially leading to a decrease in homeownership among younger generations and exacerbating existing wealth disparities.
There is no substantial evidence that agent commissions directly impact home prices. The belief that reducing seller-paid commissions will lower overall housing costs is considered overly simplistic, as home prices are more significantly influenced by market supply and demand dynamics.
The implications of these changes extend beyond just buyers and sellers. Small businesses within the housing industry, including real estate brokerages and related service providers, could suffer as well. With fewer buyers able to afford representation, these businesses might see a decline in clientele, threatening their sustainability.
The critique from industry leaders is not just a defense of the status quo but a call for more thoughtful policy-making. They warn that the CFA’s approach could inadvertently harm the very consumers it aims to protect, particularly those who are already at a disadvantage in the housing market.
Gary Acosta, CEO of NAHREP, and other contributors argue that homeownership is a crucial driver of wealth, especially for minority communities, and policies that make it more difficult to achieve could have long-lasting negative effects. As these discussions continue, it is essential for policymakers to consider the broader impact of their decisions on future generations of homeowners.
For more details, you can read the original article on HousingWire here.
While the CFA’s intention might be to create a more transparent and competitive marketplace, critics argue that the changes would likely benefit wealthier, older individuals and disadvantage first-time homebuyers, many of whom are from minority communities. Without cooperative compensation, these buyers may struggle to afford the cost of an agent, potentially leading to a decrease in homeownership among younger generations and exacerbating existing wealth disparities.
There is no substantial evidence that agent commissions directly impact home prices. The belief that reducing seller-paid commissions will lower overall housing costs is considered overly simplistic, as home prices are more significantly influenced by market supply and demand dynamics.
The implications of these changes extend beyond just buyers and sellers. Small businesses within the housing industry, including real estate brokerages and related service providers, could suffer as well. With fewer buyers able to afford representation, these businesses might see a decline in clientele, threatening their sustainability.
The critique from industry leaders is not just a defense of the status quo but a call for more thoughtful policy-making. They warn that the CFA’s approach could inadvertently harm the very consumers it aims to protect, particularly those who are already at a disadvantage in the housing market.
Gary Acosta, CEO of NAHREP, and other contributors argue that homeownership is a crucial driver of wealth, especially for minority communities, and policies that make it more difficult to achieve could have long-lasting negative effects. As these discussions continue, it is essential for policymakers to consider the broader impact of their decisions on future generations of homeowners.
For more details, you can read the original article on HousingWire here.
More Wealth Stream News
Hispanic Wealth Project Pillars
Click on one of the pillars below for more articles.
